This might go a long way to explain why I occasionally had
to resist the urge to throw Over Seventy, which was basically Wodehouseian
musings on the passage of time and other topics, across the room. I have only thrown one book across the room,
and that was a horrible treatise written about the Medieval period. I won’t even stoop to mention its title. While I had wanted to throw Atonement across
the room when I finished it, I was on a train at the time and wanted to avoid
arrest on assault charges (my aim is bad and I probably could have done some
damage to an unsuspecting fellow passenger).
The one thing that Over Seventy was good for was teaching me
a very important fact about Plum’s writing.
Wodehouse desperately needs a plot to reign him in, because otherwise he
drifts off on his flight of fancy, spinning an intricate web of witticisms that
only frustrated me. One could argue that
there was the pretense of an imaginary questionnaire to provide a narrative
anchor, but I would maintain that he needs some strong character and an aunt or
two to really keep things moving along.
There will naturally be some who enjoy the webs, but I found that my
reaction to them was akin to that of a trapped insect, thrashing about.
Since I don’t want to be a complete negative Nancy about
this, I will conclude with some unrelated observations, quotations, and other
tid-bits from the book:
-On the low critical opinion of humorists: “When I tell you
that in a recent issue of the New Yorker [sic] I was referred to as a ‘burbling
pixie’, you will see how far the evil has spread” (p. 93). Would that I had an occasion in life to make
use of the phrase “burbling pixie.”
-On celebrity: “Debunking the eminent is now a national
sport” (p. 101). So as it was in1956, so shall it ever be.
-Trying to remember a name: “ ‘Now what was it? Eulalie something? Clarice some thing [sic]” (p. 185)? The reappearance of Eulalie. I wonder what it was about that name that
caught his attention.
-Thus as it was in 1956, so shall it ever be, part two: “The
American Christmas is very different today from what it was when, as a piefaced
lad in my twenties, I first trod the sidewalks of New York. Then a simple festival, it now seems have got
elephantiasis or something. I don’t want
to do anyone an injustice, but the thought has sometimes crossed my mind that
some of the big department stores are trying to make money out of Christmas”
(p. 204).
-This is a charming image of Plum and his writing
environment, surrounded by his pets: “…I pull chair up to typewriter, adjust
the Peke which is lying on my lap, chirrup to the foxhound, throw a passing
pleasantry to the cat and pitch in” (p. 214.)
Given my general apathy to Plum’s nonfiction, I have revised
my reading plans. There are 18 books
remaining unread of the Overlook edition of Wodehouse*** an d I have arranged them by publishing date. This will let me finish off with Sunset at
Blandings, as has always been my intention.
*Read December 2015
**It should be noted that, while I claim to be doing this
for my family, I really enjoy doing all of the holiday preparations, mostly
because I adore making a fuss over things.
This is a bit difficult to justify time-wise now that I have two small
children, but somehow, I always give myself permission to do so around
Christmas. My only disappointment with
myself this year is that I was not able to make mincemeat pies,, as I have done
every year since about 2008 (maybe earlier?
I should check. 2008 was a good
year for me to start things apparently, as that is when I cracked open the
first Wodehouse for this project.). The
reason was that on the day that I had allotted, I was tending to my daughter
who we kept home from daycare with a vicious cold/cough/lurgy.
***As of this Christmas, thanks to my uncle, I now own all
of books printed in this edition. It’s
an odd feeling.
No comments:
Post a Comment