To my astonishment, one of the main female characters was an
air hostess. Generally, the women in
these stories are employed as private secretaries, writers, or actresses. While all three of these professions also
appeared, the presence of a stewardess reminded me that we weren’t in the
Kansas of the 1930’s anymore.* The
female anti-hero was a writer who was astoundingly beautiful and unsuccessfully
tried to nab an American corporate lawyer.
What is more, she had a secondary occupation: gold-digger, which is
probably one of the oldest professions in the written word. The contempt that Wodehouse had for this woman
almost dripped off of the page.
Fortune-hunters have always had an interesting time of it in
literature. They can be of the cool and
calculating mold, like Blanche Ingram in Jane Eyre, or a pitiable lass thrust
into desperate circumstances; like Gwendolyn in Daniel Deronda and about a thousand
others I could rattle off.
Vera, such as was her name, was in a different camp. True, she possessed the element of cool
calculation that is a universal trait of your average adventuress, but what
struck me was that Wodehouse wrote about her in a style that was reminiscent of
the way that he wrote his underworld characters. The thieves that appear in Wodehouse, and
there are quite a lot of them, always work in pairs or groups, and there are
numerous conversations that transpire as they concoct their nefarious
schemes. While there was no official
criminal gang, Vera did have a number of conversations with her mother, a
successful gold-digger herself, wherein they laid out the means by which Vera
would ensnare her prey. Fortunately for
our American friend, his sister intervened and tried to knock sense into him,
and then he caught the object of his lust kissing another man.
There were certainly other women in Wodehouse who were
fortune-seekers, or who had other motives regarding their intendeds, but this
was the first time that I know of where he treated this type as a
criminal. I could speculate about what
brought about this change in attitude, but the truth is, without access to the
man himself, the answer will remain unknown.
My own pet theory is that, having lived through two world wars, a Cold
War, and enduring hippies and the emergence of disco, his thinking might have
changed. While there were not many
opportunities for women to earn money when Wodehouse put pen to paper at the
dawn of the twentieth century, that situation was no longer the case in the
1970’s. It is possible that, for a man
who worked like a dog for over seventy years and wrote about ninety books, he
valued the work ethic, and thought that his characters should as well.
*While I’m ruminating over modernity and Wodehouse, I also
had a think this morning about how progressive the women are in these
books. As much as I get impatient with
poorly-written works that discuss the representation of women (few have
anything important to say, and I am usually left wondering wither the articles
on the representation of men?), it is remarkable that women play a leading role
in Wodehouse books. If I’m ever at a
loss for material on this blog, I’m afraid that I might pursue this topic at
greater length.
No comments:
Post a Comment